Norway became the first country in the world to appoint a government commission to examine the potential of MOOCs from a national perspective. In June 2013 the Ministry of Education appointed a committee of academics and educational experts to investigate the opportunities and challenges that the rapid growth of MOOCs pose to Norwegian higher education. The commission has now (16 June) presented its first full report and since it is at present only available in Norwegian it might be of interest to the rest of the world to get an overview of the conclusions (read the Norwegian version).
The commission defines MOOCs in very loose terms; online, scalable and open. As often mentioned every letter in the acronym MOOC is negotiable and the report does not restrict itself to any particular variation on the MOOC concept. This can cause confusion since the divisions between MOOCs, other forms of open education and regular e-learning often get blurred but the commission decided to cover all forms of the concept. The focus is however mostly on the high profile xMOOC interpretations of Coursera, edX etc rather than on the more undercover collaborative MOOCs offered by networks of teachers.
The report comes quickly to the point providing its main recommendations in chapter 3 with all the hard data and background coming afterwards. The recommendations are divided into two areas.
Main recommendations at government level:
- A major national investment of up to €16-47 million annually in the coordinated development of online education in the country. This includes the formation of at least one national MOOC platform, research-based competence and knowledge development, cooperation between higher education and industry in using MOOCs for work-related training and research into learning analytics.
- Create a clear Norwegian MOOC profile and cooperate in the Nordic region.
- Active promotion of open educational resources (OER).
- MOOCs that lead to credits should be included in the national educational system.
- Focus on raising the quality of online higher education and competence development for teachers.
- Questions about online examination security must be resolved.
- A national review of validation of informal learning and workplace experience.
- An inquiry on whether MOOC students should qualify for study loans and grants.
- The establishment of financial incentives for collaboration between universities in the development of online education.
- The wide experience of quality online learning that is already present in the country’s institutions should be the base for any MOOC initiatives.
- Institutions need to invest in digital competence development for all staff.
- Institutions actively promote the use and creation of open educational resources.
- Improved routines and opportunities for recognition of prior learning and competences.
- Institutions should use MOOCs to leverage national and international collaboration.
- MOOCs in society (background, relevance, international and Norwegian contexts)
- From flexible education to MOOCs (online learning history)
- Evolution of MOOCs
- MOOC participants and their motivation
- Documentation of achieved competence
- MOOCs in Norwegian higher education
- Quality and learning outcomes
- MOOC delivery forms
- Copyright issues and openness
- Workplace learning
- Continuing education
- Discussion on the interpretation of “free”
- Government study grants and funding
- Financial consequences of the commission’s proposals
One aspect that is not covered here is that there are many examples of open online learning that don't (often deliberately) call themselves MOOC but share many common characteristics. The OER university partnership is mentioned but maybe deserves more attention since it attempts to provide a framework for offering credible credentials for non-formal and informal learning. A Norwegian member of the partnership would be a significant move to legitimize open learning in Norway for example. I have not found any mention of other open learning platforms like P2PU (Peer 2 Peer university) who have been facilitating MOOC-like collaborative learning for several years as well as platforms like Udemy that allow teachers and specialists to create and market their own courses. However a report cannot cover everything and the important point about this one is that it has been produced at governmental level, showing clearly that open learning has at last reached the corridors of power.
An English version of the report is promised in the near future.